[585] in Kerberos_V5_Development
rd_safe.c
tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Fri Jan 18 20:06:05 1991
Silly question..... why do we have the the sender_addr and recv_addr
arguments to krb5_rd_safe(), when neither of them are used?
I can understand why we use krb5_os_localaddr() instead of the
recv_addr, although I think there should be a flag to krb5_rd_safe() to
tell it to use the passed recv_addr instead of the krb5_os_localaddr().
But why aren't we checking the sender_addr?
The same, by the way, is true for krb5_rd_priv()
