[325] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: Extension to krb5_unparse_name
jtkohl@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (jtkohl@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Fri Oct 12 14:22:28 1990
[let's move this into the meeting to avoid mail delays and keep my mailbox
clean]
The problem is that the library would be reallocating something the
caller allocated. If they used different allocators....
Maybe if the client passed in a pointer to a NULL pointer the first
time, and it gets allocated like usual, with the pointer filled in.
Then the library will have done the allocation, and should be free to do
the reallocation on further calls.
