[2391] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: Kerberos files
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Theodore Y. Ts'o)
Wed Jun 11 22:49:00 1997
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 22:48:17 -0400
From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
To: "Michael P. Barboni" <barboni@ucsd.edu>
Cc: krbdev@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Michael P. Barboni's message of Mon, 02 Jun 1997 14:47:44 -0700,
<3.0.1.32.19970602144744.008b8100@nothing.ucsd.edu>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 1997 14:47:44 -0700
From: "Michael P. Barboni ('Bonez')" <barboni@ucsd.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
My apologies for not getting back to you sooner; I've unfortunately been
fairly swamped lately.
We are currently developing a new software package for our users here at
the University which would allow them to use Kerberos 5 in combination with
Qualcomm's Eudora.
I'm assuming it would be wise to wait for at least the 1.0 patchlevel 1
release if not for v1.1 - but we'd also like to get permission to include
it within our installation so as to streamline the process for our
end users.
1.0 Patchlevel 1 was released two months ago. See our web page at
http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/www
for more details.
No permission is needed to include Kerberos within your installation.
See the copyright permission notice for more details; it's pretty
straight forward.
So in short, we wanted your opinion on which patchlevel/release to wait for
before including it in our package (kerberos service here is already setup)
- and additionally, wanted to make sure you didn't have a problem with us
including this recommend patchlevel/release under our own installer.
Go ahead and use 1.0 patchlevel 1. It should be quite stable.
- Ted
