[2326] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: Further gss v2 support in K5 rel 1 updates
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Theodore Y. Ts'o)
Thu Mar 27 17:47:10 1997
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 17:45:56 -0500
From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
Cc: Andrew Gray <agray@osf.org>, "'krbdev@mit.edu'" <krbdev@MIT.EDU>
In-Reply-To: Theodore Y. Ts'o's message of Thu, 27 Mar 1997 15:04:49 -0500,
<9703272004.AA22440@dcl.MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 15:04:49 -0500
From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
I hadn't originally planned to support prot_ready_state, but having
looked into the code, it's actually pretty easy to support. So yes, you
can expect to see it in the foreseeable future.
While I was stuck in a boring meeting (tm), I implemented
prot_ready_flag, trans_flag, gss_export_name(), and
gss_duplicate_name(). I haven't tested it yet, but the functions are
pretty simple.
The functions which we still need to implement for GSSAPI V2 complaince
are:
gss_cannonicalize_name() ---- trivial, since we have a
single-mechanism implementation
gss_export_name() ---- not much work, we just have to find
gss_import_name() ---- time to do it
This last was a typo; gss_import_name() should be gss_duplicate_name().
- Ted