[2039] in Kerberos_V5_Development
thawing and freezing, bug meeting
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Barry Jaspan)
Wed Nov 27 12:29:32 1996
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 17:29:20 GMT
From: "Barry Jaspan" <bjaspan@MIT.EDU>
To: krbdev@MIT.EDU
I do not think we should feel bad about having to make a number of
thaw/freeze cycles. We're doing a more throough job of verifying this
release than any previous krb5 release, I suspect, and instead we
should be pleased that our procedures are catching these bugs *before*
the 1.0 release goes out.
In a similar vein, there have been a number of bugs reported to gnats
over the last couple days (many by me). Most are not 1.0 priority,
but some may be. I suggest we have another bug meeting to prioritize
the new bugs; hopefully, none will be declared high priority, but if
there are some then it is better that we determine that now than later
(e.g. after the friendly-tester release).
Barry
