[19121] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: Proposal for using NAPTR/URI records
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brandon Allbery)
Thu Feb 26 14:19:35 2015
From: Brandon Allbery <ballbery@sinenomine.net>
To: "nico@cryptonector.com" <nico@cryptonector.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:19:27 +0000
Message-ID: <1424978367.3235.5.camel@vikktakkht>
In-Reply-To: <20150226191708.GE9895@localhost>
Content-Language: en-US
Content-ID: <171880E6A9A8BD4F8DF026CC9FB7473F@mex05.mlsrvr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "krbdev@mit.edu" <krbdev@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: krbdev-bounces@mit.edu
On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 13:17 -0600, Nico Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 05:15:15PM +0000, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 10:55 -0600, Nico Williams wrote:
> > > > 2. DNS stacks which drop queries for unknown QTYPEs.
> > >
> > > type=ANY.
> >
> > I've seen too many commodity routers that (a) insist on giving out the
> > address of their internal DNS caching server (b) silently drop any RR
> > they don't understand from cached/forwarded replies.
>
> How can (b) work in a DNSSEC world? I imagine the affected zones are
> opting out.
You think commodity routers speak DNSSEC?
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates
allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net
unix openafs kerberos infrastructure xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list krbdev@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev
