[19104] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: Proposal for using NAPTR/URI records
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nathaniel McCallum)
Wed Feb 25 14:24:16 2015
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 14:23:59 -0500 (EST)
From: Nathaniel McCallum <npmccallum@redhat.com>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Message-ID: <517459789.25699016.1424892239233.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAK3OfOhVp_9raLqvfrFyAJuLFkoFH-+8Ku2BqX3ymkW5c15XXw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: krbdev@mit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: krbdev-bounces@mit.edu
----- Original Message -----
> The other thing is: NAPTR is way too complex a beast, and if URI RRs
> will do the trick, then please stay away from NAPTR.
By this, do you mean?
1. Look up SRV.
2. If SRV fails, look up URI.
If no, then what?
If yes, then please defined precisely what you do and do not mean by "fails."
Nathaniel
_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list krbdev@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev
