[17500] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: Proposed platform assumption changes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Will Fiveash)
Tue Jan 31 21:18:34 2012
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:18:25 -0600
From: Will Fiveash <will.fiveash@oracle.com>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Message-ID: <20120201021825.GB27916@oracle.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>,
Greg Hudson <ghudson@mit.edu>, krbdev@mit.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAK3OfOiqQ8-3zJDq+AUWXn5pwFYNKYG9xCuxkAssTbWm=8tbEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: krbdev@mit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: krbdev-bounces@mit.edu
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 03:42:41PM -0600, Nico Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Greg Hudson <ghudson@mit.edu> wrote:
> > * People would really like C99 designated initializers, but the ways of
> > getting them (dumping MSVC) or sort of getting them (ugly macros) are
> > objectionable.
>
> I've had to chase function calls across function tables/vtables/ops
> vectors/whatever you want to call them a few times in the past two
> days. Each time I want to chase something like "cache->ops->store" to
> all the ccache store functions, say, I can't do it with a trivial
> cscope symbol search. No, such searches are painful. I don't care
> how ugly the macros are: they would make my life simpler. The lack of
> support for this makes me wonder if I might be the only one in this
> community using cscope.
I'm with you my friend. Hunting through that level of indirection is a
pain in the a[s][s]. Anything that can help is appreciated.
--
Will Fiveash
Oracle Solaris Software Engineer
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/kerberos/
Sent using mutt, a sweet, text based e-mail app <http://www.mutt.org/>
_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list krbdev@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev
