[17497] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: Proposed platform assumption changes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Henry B. Hotz)
Tue Jan 31 21:08:11 2012
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
From: "Henry B. Hotz" <hotz@jpl.nasa.gov>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.339.1327770549.18262.krbdev@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:08:06 -0800
Message-Id: <EDBAA316-FD91-47B5-BF55-5DDC2FCA7855@jpl.nasa.gov>
To: "krbdev@mit.edu" <krbdev@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: krbdev-bounces@mit.edu
On Jan 28, 2012, at 9:09 AM, krbdev-request@mit.edu wrote:
> * POSIX signals, IPv6, and thread support have become ubiquitous on
> platforms people are likely to build krb5 on. We can reduce
> complexity (particularly in network code by assuming IPv6) by
> assuming these features.
I'm guessing this is a distinction without a difference, but IPv6 support is widespread in OSs, NOT widespread on production networks (yet).
------------------------------------------------------
The opinions expressed in this message are mine,
not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government.
Henry.B.Hotz@jpl.nasa.gov, or hbhotz@oxy.edu
_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list krbdev@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev
