[17167] in Kerberos_V5_Development

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [PATCH] Plugin Interface Change

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Greg Hudson)
Thu Sep 15 18:58:32 2011

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson@mit.edu>
To: Simo Sorce <simo@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1316124614.2684.407.camel@willson.li.ssimo.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:58:07 -0400
Message-ID: <1316127487.718.227.camel@t410>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: "krbdev@mit.edu" <krbdev@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: krbdev-bounces@mit.edu

On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 18:10 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> Should you drop them always or only over UDP ? I suspect that if you
> have a TCP connection you should reply to it ? Or should you drop the
> TCP connection and force the client to reconnect ?
> Or did I completely misunderstand the issue here ?

A retransmit over TCP would be unexpected client behavior (a genuinely
new request would have a difference nonce, and at least the MIT client
code never retries a TCP request).  But in theory, if we get one of
those over TCP, we should either process it or close the TCP connection.

There are other circumstances where we drop a request; I'd have to check
to make sure we do the right thing if the request came in via TCP.


_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list             krbdev@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post