[17010] in Kerberos_V5_Development

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: prevalence of "right" time zones without timegm()?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andrew Bartlett)
Thu Jul 7 19:09:16 2011

From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
To: Tom Yu <tlyu@mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 08:51:23 +1000
In-Reply-To: <ldvsjqhke83.fsf@cathode-dark-space.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <1310079085.20213.30.camel@ruth>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: tridge@samba.org, lha@samba.org, "krbdev@mit.edu" <krbdev@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: krbdev-bounces@mit.edu

On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 16:50 -0400, Tom Yu wrote:
> Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> writes:
> 
> > This does really happen in the real world, and is a nightmare to track
> > down (I spent hours on it).  We (Samba Team) found it out via Heimdal,
> > and Fedora 13 or 14 (current as of 2010-09) systems in Seattle time zone
> > (while at a Microsoft interop :-)
> 
> What are the business reasons for configuring a "right" time zone?
> And do the people who choose to do so fully recognize the risks
> involved?

Perhaps I wasn't clear.  Microsoft prepared some default Fedora Linux
installations for us.  They selected the west coat US timezone (as you
would).  This was not some special setup, it was a default setup.  That
is why I'm so concerned about the idea of punting this as 'user error'. 

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>

_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list             krbdev@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post