[16859] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: RFC: preauth benchmarking methodology
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Simo Sorce)
Tue Jun 7 08:52:20 2011
From: Simo Sorce <simo@redhat.com>
To: Nathaniel McCallum <npmccallum@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1307393338.2174.11.camel@localhost>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 08:52:12 -0400
Message-ID: <1307451132.2613.164.camel@willson.li.ssimo.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: dpal@redhat.com, krbdev@mit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: krbdev-bounces@mit.edu
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 16:48 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 16:48 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> > Probably we should test with multiple worker processes.
> > So this is another dimension to throw into the result matrix.
>
> Given that multiple processes are entirely independent, I'm not sure we
> gain anything by this. Especially since our goal is to measure the
> effect of an asynchronous event loop that lives entirely within one
> process. If we add multiple processes, we are no longer measuring the
> event loop but system performance.
We are still measuring how many operation we can do in parallel. The
number of parallel process is fixed and limited and cannot change.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list krbdev@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev
