[16778] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: Kernel subset design issues
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sam Hartman)
Tue Apr 26 04:16:30 2011
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>
To: ghudson@mit.edu
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 04:16:10 -0400
In-Reply-To: <201104252346.p3PNkvTx013448@outgoing.mit.edu> (ghudson@mit.edu's
message of "Mon, 25 Apr 2011 19:46:57 -0400 (EDT)")
Message-ID: <tslboztqvg5.fsf@mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: krbdev@mit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: krbdev-bounces@mit.edu
Does anyone plan to do a kernel CIFS implementation or a kernel
implementation requiring parts of DCE RPC?
If so, the IOV routines will be needed.
Also, if your kernel can support it, it seems like doing in-place crypto
would be a real win, and thus IOV would be desirable.
Why not only use IOV and enable the #define to do everything in terms of
iov instead of having iov and non-iov wrap implementations?
--Sam
l
_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list krbdev@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev
