[16591] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: question about krb5_verify_init_creds() and verify_ap_req_nofail
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sam Hartman)
Wed Jan 12 06:34:03 2011
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>
To: Greg Hudson <ghudson@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 06:33:49 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20110112001541.GC22291@sun.com> (Will Fiveash's message of "Tue,
11 Jan 2011 18:15:41 -0600")
Message-ID: <tsl4o9efjaa.fsf@mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: MIT Kerberos Dev List <krbdev@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: krbdev-bounces@mit.edu
>>>>> "Will" == Will Fiveash <will.fiveash@oracle.com> writes:
Will> verify_ap_req_nofail runs a close second in the awkward option
Will> name contest (which a google search will confirm). 8^)
I still cannot figure out how its option name corresponds in any way to
its behavior. It's sort of licke
Am I missing something or is the logic backwards?
I understand that we cannot change the semantics without changing the
option name.
_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list krbdev@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev
