[16547] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: Should 6838 (renew broken) be a 1.9 blocker?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sam Hartman)
Fri Dec 10 13:15:48 2010
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>
To: Tom Yu <tlyu@mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:15:44 -0500
In-Reply-To: <ldv62v1338l.fsf@cathode-dark-space.mit.edu> (Tom Yu's message of
"Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:13:46 -0500")
Message-ID: <tslpqt9cx4f.fsf@carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: krbdev@mit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: krbdev-bounces@mit.edu
client side.
I'm noticing this against athena.
_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list krbdev@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev
