[16482] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: X-CACHECONF in cache type 0504
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sam Hartman)
Fri Nov 19 10:49:10 2010
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>
To: Tim Alsop <Tim@cybersafe.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:49:05 -0500
In-Reply-To: <C90BF019.2784D%Tim.Alsop@CyberSafe.com> (Tim Alsop's message of
"Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:15:30 +0000")
Message-ID: <tsl7hg9fh5a.fsf@carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Weijun Wang <weijun.wang@oracle.com>, "krbdev@MIT.EDU" <krbdev@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: krbdev-bounces@mit.edu
>>>>> "Tim" == Tim Alsop <Tim@cybersafe.com> writes:
Tim> On 19/11/2010 05:52, "Greg Hudson" <ghudson@MIT.EDU> wrote:
>> For the purposes of ignoring config entries in our klist, we
>> recognize config entries if they match both the realm
>> (X-CACHECONF:) and the first component of the name
>> (krb5_ccache_conf_data).
Tim> Is above only true for MIT implementation ? E.g. If/when
Tim> Heimdal or ourselves (CyberSafe) want to store config data in
Tim> cache, can we use different component name and realm name ?
Tim> Also, is this config data described in a draft or RFC, or is it
Tim> 100% proprietary to MIT code ?
Well, the patch was submitted to us by one of the Heimdal developers, so
it is quite possible they will do something (or have done something)
compatible.
_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list krbdev@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev
