[16474] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: X-CACHECONF in cache type 0504
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tim Alsop)
Thu Nov 18 14:23:32 2010
From: Tim Alsop <Tim@cybersafe.com>
To: Greg Hudson <ghudson@mit.edu>, Tim Alsop <Tim@cybersafe.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:15:21 +0000
Message-ID: <C90B2A61.27716%Tim.Alsop@CyberSafe.com>
In-Reply-To: <1290107139.2633.1218.camel@ray>
Content-Language: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "krbdev@MIT.EDU" <krbdev@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: krbdev-bounces@mit.edu
Greg,
I tried with MIT 1.1.8 klist and got:
[talsop@shrek ~]$ /opt/mitkrb5-1.8.1/bin/klist -efa
Ticket cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_4000
Default principal: talsop@DEV.LOCAL
Valid starting Expires Service principal
11/18/10 19:09:47 11/19/10 05:05:20 krbtgt/DEV.LOCAL@DEV.LOCAL
renew until 11/19/10 19:09:47, Flags: RIA
Etype (skey, tkt): ArcFour with HMAC/md5, ArcFour with HMAC/md5
Addresses: (none)
[talsop@shrek ~]$
However, if I look in the cache file, the X-CACHCONF entry exists. See
below:
[talsop@shrek ~]$ cat /tmp/krb5cc_4000 | grep X-CACHE
Binary file (standard input) matches
[talsop@shrek ~]$
Thanks,
Tim
On 18/11/2010 19:05, "Greg Hudson" <ghudson@mit.edu> wrote:
>On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 14:00 -0500, Tim Alsop wrote:
>> Is it possible that the MIT klist is not showing the extra entry ? We
>>are
>> not using MIT klist, which might be why we see it ?
>> Just a thought.
>
>I verified by stepping through the code which writes the config entry,
>and also by displaying the cache with a 1.6 klist.
>
>
_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list krbdev@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev
