[1641] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: preliminary appdefaults patch
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Eichin)
Mon Aug 26 20:31:29 1996
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans@MIT.EDU>
Cc: "E. Jay Berkenbilt" <ejb@ql.org>, kenh@cmf.nrl.navy.mil, krbdev@MIT.EDU
From: Mark Eichin <eichin@cygnus.com>
Date: 26 Aug 1996 20:30:39 -0400
In-Reply-To: Sam Hartman's message of 26 Aug 1996 19:10:57 -0400
I recall + for options is, if not a violation of the posix spec,
certainly outside the spirit of it. This is why gnu getopt uses --
though it used to use + for long options.
Proven did an unencumbered reimplementation of getopt that's in our
tree; we'll merge it in to MIT at some point (Marc is back and there's
a formal meeting with Ted planned to schedule what we actually put in
the MIT tree and when, so this will get resolved soon, directly
instead of over chinese food :-)
It looks like rlogin uses:
{ "noforwardable", 0, &off_option, 'F' },
{ "noforward", 0, &off_option, 'f' },
{ "noencrypt", 0, &off_option, 'x' },
{ "forwardable", 0, NULL, 'F' },
{ "forward", 0, NULL, 'f' },
{ "encrypt", 0, NULL, 'x' },
{ "noflow", 0, NULL, 0 },
