[16255] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: r24304 : 0 cheksum type on k_verify_checksum_iov
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sam Hartman)
Fri Sep 10 14:23:42 2010
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>
To: lukeh@padl.com
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:23:29 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20100910181910.6057041D0@carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org> (Sam
Hartman's message of "Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:19:10 -0400 (EDT)")
Message-ID: <tsl1v91zcda.fsf@live.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: krbdev@mit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: krbdev-bounces@mit.edu
>>>>> "Sam" == Sam Hartman <hartmans@MIT.EDU> writes:
Sam> Luke, I don't really object to the change, although I'm puzzled
Sam> why it is necessary. Doesn't the krb5_checksum object have a
Sam> checksum type? When do you need to guess checksum type on
Sam> verify? _______________________________________________ krbdev
Ah.
I should have realized the answer to this...
If you're implementing something that looks a lot like RFC 4121 but is
not Kerberos, you need this.
_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list krbdev@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev
