[16114] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: Profile include support
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Simo Sorce)
Mon Aug 23 15:47:11 2010
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:47:06 -0400
From: Simo Sorce <ssorce@redhat.com>
To: krbdev@mit.edu
Message-ID: <20100823154706.5bd5ed33@willson.li.ssimo.org>
In-Reply-To: <1282587552.8066.1269.camel@ray>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: krbdev-bounces@mit.edu
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:19:12 -0400
Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 14:07 -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > Greg, I'm sorry to be difficult, but I believe I may have
> > discovered an additional requirement for this package.
>
> No need to apologize; better for this to come up now than later.
>
> > 1) Allow some architecture specific directory such as libdirto be
> > substituted into profile include statements.
> >
> > 2) Allow some architecture specific directory to be substituted into
> > plugin paths.
> >
> > 3) Have plugin paths relative to libdir.
>
> I like option 3--or more precisely, the variation of making them
> realtive to ${libdir}/krb5/plugins. There's no use case for shared
> object paths being relative to the process's current working
> directory, so making them relative to libdir is harmless. Absolute
> paths would still be treated as absolute, of course.
Ack, 3 is the best way, we (RH) would probably have to patch MIT to do
it that way anyway if you don't.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list krbdev@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev
