[15994] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: Plugin project proposal
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nicolas Williams)
Thu Jul 15 16:42:36 2010
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:41:14 -0500
From: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@oracle.com>
To: Simo Sorce <ssorce@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20100715204113.GN22556@oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100715163222.01f36f0c@willson.li.ssimo.org>
Cc: krbdev@mit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: krbdev-bounces@mit.edu
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 04:32:22PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:13:14 -0700
> Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure we know which is likely to be the most common
> > operation. My guess is actually that we'll have very static
> > interfaces that will accumulate desired changes and then periodically
> > undergo complete revision, which is why I like the vtable approach
> > because it's probably the cleanest for handling that sort of
> > situation.
>
> Yes, I like the vtable approach because it tells the plugin writer with
> a single look what is the set of functions relevant for you.
And a manpage and/or header file can't do that because...?
Nico
--
_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list krbdev@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev
