[15874] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: krb5 libraries and circular dependencies
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nicolas Williams)
Thu Jun 3 11:13:59 2010
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 10:12:35 -0500
From: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@oracle.com>
To: Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu>
Message-ID: <20100603151235.GM9605@oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4700342484EEA92456BE4C59@lysithea.fac.cs.cmu.edu>
Cc: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>, Ken Raeburn <raeburn@mit.edu>,
krbdev@mit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: krbdev-bounces@mit.edu
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 04:10:42AM -0400, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
> --On Monday, May 31, 2010 07:48:35 PM -0500 Nicolas Williams
> <Nicolas.Williams@oracle.com> wrote:
> >There's no reason to use Solaris threads instead of pthreads: under the
> >hood they are the same thing.
>
> To be extra-clear: Solaris threads and pthreads are different API's
> onto the same underlying thread system. You can mix and match the
> API's with impunity.
Right. For portability you'll want to stick to pthreads.
> >I don't know about Mach (or did you mean MacOS?).
>
> If you look closely and squint just right, MacOS _is_ Mach.
I know, but it's also BSDish. I don't know enough about developing
threaded apps in C in MacOS.
Nico
--
_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list krbdev@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev
