[15842] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: design choices for a loadable module interface
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tom Yu)
Wed May 26 10:45:13 2010
To: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@oracle.com>
From: Tom Yu <tlyu@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 10:45:03 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20100526141242.GU9605@oracle.com> (Nicolas Williams's message of
"Wed, 26 May 2010 09:12:42 -0500")
Message-ID: <ldv1vcyu3gw.fsf@cathode-dark-space.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "krbdev@mit.edu" <krbdev@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: krbdev-bounces@mit.edu
Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@oracle.com> writes:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:00:24AM -0400, Greg Hudson wrote:
>> If by the above statement you mean "dynamically load every plugin
>> implementation, with no builtins," that's a possibility, I suppose. It
>
> I didn't. What's a builtin?
By built-in, I mean that the plugin module is part of the library
shared object or program executable that calls the module. I'll
update the wiki page.
_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list krbdev@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev
