[15735] in Kerberos_V5_Development

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Sanity check: GSSAPI SPI simplifications

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sam Hartman)
Fri Apr 30 10:42:03 2010

From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>
To: ghudson@mit.edu
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 10:41:50 -0400
In-Reply-To: <201004271017.o3RAHRh6011477@outgoing.mit.edu> (ghudson@mit.edu's
	message of "Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:17:27 -0400 (EDT)")
Message-ID: <tsltyqt0zpt.fsf@mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: krbdev@mit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: krbdev-bounces@mit.edu

It seems reasonable to make these changes only if we never plan to
decouple the krb5 mechanism from our mech glue into a separate DSO.

Put slightly differently, it seems reasonable for us to do this now.  It
would not be reasonable for a third party to take the same approach
because it would create problems if their mechanism were used with a
different mech glue.

In order to do this in a general manner, you'd want to standardize some
behaviors.
_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list             krbdev@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post