[15621] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: prompter type question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nicolas Williams)
Thu Mar 18 16:18:07 2010
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:17:20 -0500
From: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <20100318201720.GQ18167@Sun.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <tslwrx9xu7z.fsf@mit.edu>
Cc: MIT Kerberos Dev List <krbdev@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: krbdev-bounces@mit.edu
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 04:14:56PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com> writes:
>
> Nicolas> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 01:17:37PM -0500, Will Fiveash wrote:
> >> typedef struct _krb5_prompt { char *prompt; int hidden; krb5_data
> >> *reply; } krb5_prompt;
>
> Nicolas> Arguably a PREAUTH type prompt with hidden set would be a
> Nicolas> prompt for a PIN or OTP, while a PREAUTH type prompt with
> Nicolas> hidden unset would be an informative prompt of some kind
> Nicolas> (any kind).
>
> Hmm.
> I'd expect that hidden would be clear for OTP and possibly pin.
I wouldn't! I'd expect prompts for secrets to be echo-off.
_______________________________________________
krbdev mailing list krbdev@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev
