[1168] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: CVS branches for releases
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Theodore Y. Ts'o)
Mon May 13 20:00:36 1996
Date: Mon, 13 May 1996 20:00:25 -0400
From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans@MIT.EDU>
Cc: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>, Sam Hartman <hartmans@MIT.EDU>,
krbdev@MIT.EDU, ghudson@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Sam Hartman's message of 10 May 1996 17:40:30 -0400,
<tslenosqka9.fsf@tertius.mit.edu>
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@MIT.EDU>
Date: 10 May 1996 17:40:30 -0400
"Theodore> The Krb5 tree has been in a state of gradual congealing
"Theodore> for the past couple of weeks; only bug fixes or changes
"Theodore> which have been specifically cleared by me should be
"Theodore> checked in at this point.
The point of my message was that this is in most cases a silly
way of managing a CVS tree when you can create release branches.
People who want to create release branches are of course welcome to do
so. The OV integration is done as a release branch, for example.
- Ted
