[849] in Kerberos-V5-bugs
Re: ss, et configure.in and Makefile.in
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Theodore Ts'o)
Tue Oct 11 22:16:36 1994
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 1994 22:16:25 +0500
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@MIT.EDU>
To: Ezra Peisach <epeisach@MIT.EDU>
Cc: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Ezra Peisach's message of Tue, 11 Oct 1994 21:51:19 EDT,
<9410120151.AA00637@kangaroo.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 1994 21:51:19 EDT
From: Ezra Peisach <epeisach@MIT.EDU>
Is there a reason why ARADD is used in the standard libraries and
ARCHIVE is used in ss and et...
ARCHIVE is not as good when you modify one of the objects... The flags
which I am seeing, then
complain about multiple definitions in the library.... Perhaps the
Makefile.in should rm the archive before using the ARCHIVE directive....
Why not just use ARADD for ss and et as well? I suspect the reason why
we're using ARCHIVE for ss and et is simply historic; it's what they
were using before.
- Ted
