[3939] in Kerberos-V5-bugs
[krbdev.mit.edu #1353] Decide on a long-term krb524 strategy
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sam Hartman via RT)
Fri Feb 14 22:33:26 2003
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 22:32:53 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <rt-1353-4600.6.30421498771241@krbdev.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <rt-1353@krbdev.mit.edu>
From: "Sam Hartman via RT" <rt-comment@krbdev.mit.edu>
To: krb5-prs@mit.edu
Reply-To: rt-comment@krbdev.mit.edu
Errors-To: krb5-bugs-bounces@mit.edu
Do we want to move this into libkrb5? One disadvantage would be that
our ABI would be different when built --without-krb4 than when boult
--with-krb4.
If not, do we want to install a header and make it a shared library?
Also, we need to deal in some manner with the fact that the error
table initializer is needed on Unix but not exported on KFM.
_______________________________________________
krb5-bugs mailing list
krb5-bugs@mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krb5-bugs
