[3548] in Kerberos-V5-bugs
Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #1224]ASN1 optional fields
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ezra Peisach via RT)
Wed Oct 23 23:02:29 2002
Message-Id: <rt-1224-3216.10.2226623378643@krbdev.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <rt-1224@krbdev.mit.edu>
From: "Ezra Peisach via RT" <rt-comment@krbdev.mit.edu>
Reply-To: rt-comment@krbdev.mit.edu
To: krb5-prs@mit.edu
Errors-To: krb5-bugs-admin@mit.edu
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 23:01:22 -0400 (EDT)
The way that the code is writen today for this sam handling
is that we send it as present - but empty.
I need to look a little more at the decoder - it may be that
present but empty (i.e. len 0) - may have the same effect as
not present at all. The decoder clearly anticipates that
the optional strings may not come over the wire.
Ezra
_______________________________________________
krb5-bugs mailing list
krb5-bugs@mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krb5-bugs
