[3546] in Kerberos-V5-bugs
[krbdev.mit.edu #1224]ASN1 optional fields
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sam Hartman via RT)
Wed Oct 23 22:18:14 2002
Mail-Followup-To: rt@krbdev.mit.edu
Message-Id: <rt-1224-3215.4.32800007499239@krbdev.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <rt-1224@krbdev.mit.edu>
From: "Sam Hartman via RT" <rt-comment@krbdev.mit.edu>
Reply-To: rt-comment@krbdev.mit.edu
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: epeisach@mit.edu
Cc: krb5-prs@mit.edu
Errors-To: krb5-bugs-admin@mit.edu
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 22:17:13 -0400 (EDT)
Note that at the ASN.1 level, an optional string that is present but
empty is different from a string that is absent. I think that for
Kerberos as it stands today, this change is probably fine, but it is
possible someone will want to distinguish these cases.
_______________________________________________
krb5-bugs mailing list
krb5-bugs@mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krb5-bugs
