[2108] in Kerberos-V5-bugs
Re: Hmm - bug reports from Korea???
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sam Hartman)
Mon Jul 22 20:26:47 1996
To: Mark Eichin <eichin@cygnus.com>
Cc: Ezra Peisach <epeisach@MIT.EDU>, krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@MIT.EDU>
Date: 22 Jul 1996 20:26:20 -0400
In-Reply-To: Mark Eichin's message of Sun, 14 Jul 1996 01:21:46 -0400
>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Eichin <eichin@cygnus.com> writes:
Mark> I personally ignore postings to comp.protocols.kerberos
Mark> asking for help from outside US/Canada, especially if there
Mark> is any indication that they are actually using recent
Mark> non-export-licensed code.
What type of questions can we legally answer? Certainly, I
would assume that it would be reasonable to answer a question based
off the RFC or other public documentation. I would feel uncomfortable
telling someone outside the US where to find Kerberos.
I tend to ignore most support-related questions from outside
the US. However, is it reasonable to acknowledge bug reports ? I
assume it is reasonable to fix the bugs. I also assume it would be a
potential problem to send patches outside the US. (BTW, are there any
people on krb5-bugs who are outside the US?)
--Sam
