[1947] in Kerberos-V5-bugs
Re: Why make check fails under Ultrix....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Eichin)
Mon Jun 3 01:48:49 1996
To: epeisach@MIT.EDU
Cc: krbdev@MIT.EDU, krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
From: Mark Eichin <eichin@MIT.EDU>
Date: 03 Jun 1996 01:48:32 -0400
In-Reply-To: epeisach@MIT.EDU's message of Sun, 2 Jun 1996 18:50:02 -0400
epeisach@MIT.EDU writes:
> The fix is to conditionalize the building of getdtablesize.o on the
> need to build it... If you do not include it, ftpd works under ultrix....
FYI hpux and possibly some svr4 systems need it. Yeah, it should have
been done as a seperate module, but that bit of code has been in there
since V4. *MY* question is, why is ultrix so broken that
AC_HAVE_FUNCS(getcwd getdtablesize)
didn't work? or did you have a broken cache? This test should be just
as good as what setenv does with AC_REPLACE_FUNCS...
