[1828] in Kerberos-V5-bugs
Re: rlogind wtmp logging...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sam Hartman)
Sun Mar 3 17:13:23 1996
To: epeisach@MIT.EDU
Cc: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
From: hartmans@MIT.EDU (Sam Hartman)
Date: 03 Mar 1996 17:12:57 -0500
In-Reply-To: epeisach@MIT.EDU's message of Sun, 3 Mar 1996 13:47:12 -0500
>>>>> "epeisach" == epeisach <epeisach@MIT.EDU> writes:
epeisach> While testing out rlogind... (Alpha Dec Unix 3,2 - I
epeisach> think also with 2.1 as well).
>> last | more
epeisach> epeisach ttyp7 KANGAROO.MIT.EDU Sun Mar 03 13:42 - 13:42
epeisach> (00:00) rlogin ttyp7 Sun Mar 03 13:42 - 13:42 (00:00)
epeisach> epeisach ttyp7 KANGAROO.MIT.EDU Sun Mar 03 13:38 - 13:38
epeisach> (00:00) rlogin ttyp7 Sun Mar 03 13:38 - 13:38 (00:00)
epeisach> epeisach ttyp3 nemesis.rose.bra Sun Mar 03 10:38 still
epeisach> logged in
epeisach> Should the rlogin lines show up in wtmp?
Possibly; it's unclear, but it wouldn't surprise me if the answer was no.
I am also concerned that the time looks wrong.; were you really logged in for less than a minute each time?
Could you send me some sample output of last generated by the native rlogind (non-Kerberized)?
epeisach> Should pty_update_utmp update wtmp as well?
Yes, generally it should and does. Perhaps not for LOGIN_PROCESS type entrys.
epeisach> Ezra
