[1591] in Kerberos-V5-bugs
Re: Patches to Beta 5-1/2 (24 July snapshot)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Derek Atkins)
Tue Aug 8 15:37:26 1995
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 1995 12:36:56 -0700
To: tytso@MIT.EDU
Cc: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
From: Derek Atkins <warlord@Eng.Sun.COM>
In-Reply-To: <9508081923.AA00064@dcl.MIT.EDU> (tytso@MIT.EDU)
> No, that's fine. At this point I've figured out and applied all the
> patches except for the autoconf changes (have you contacted djm yet, or
> shall I do that) and the Makefile dependency changes.
No, I have not contacted him. If you could do that, I would
appreciate it.
> make is supposed to be able to figure this out on its own. In the case
> where it may come from a .c, .f, or .s extension, all other makes can
> figure this out on their own; they basically look and see which of these
> files exist. What the search order that a particular make might use
> isn't well defined, but if there is only one possible source file which
> could be used to make the .o, it's generally safe to assume that the
> make program can figure this out on its own.
Agreed. In fact, it does work fine when working in the same
directory. Its when sources are in a different directory that it
fails to find the them. This is probably related to the other make
bugs that I've reported. If make does not get fixed, I'll probably
just include "gnumake" as part of the sources and use that.
Thanks, Ted!
-derek
