[149] in Kerberos-V5-bugs
[Steve Lunt: Re: Announcing the beta release of MIT's Kerberos V5 implementation]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John T Kohl)
Wed Jun 19 17:08:20 1991
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 91 17:08:08 EDT
From: John T Kohl <jtkohl@ATHENA.MIT.EDU>
To: krb5-bugs@ATHENA.MIT.EDU, lunt@ctt.bellcore.com
why? because we goofed. new-telnet is a newer version from folks at
Cray which we haven't massaged into proper V5 form yet (it also has some
unsavory protocol things that we intend to fix).
I've already noted the need to fix this in MIT's working list of things
to fix.
------- Forwarded Message
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 91 17:28:05 EDT
From: Steve Lunt <lunt@ctt.bellcore.com>
To: jtkohl@MIT.EDU, tytso@athena.mit.edu
Subject: Re: Announcing the beta release of MIT's Kerberos V5 implementation
Why is there an appl/telnet and an appl/new-telnet in the source tree?
new-telnet is not mentioned in doc/SOURCE-TREE but is mentioned in
doc/TREE-GRAPH.
-- Steve
------- End Forwarded Message
