[1355] in Kerberos-V5-bugs
krb5_recauth rc_type is unused
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ezra Peisach)
Wed May 3 01:06:10 1995
To: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
Date: Wed, 03 May 1995 01:06:01 EDT
From: Ezra Peisach <epeisach@MIT.EDU>
------- Forwarded Message
Received: from PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU by e40-po.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA25913; Wed, 3 May 95 00:53:06 EDT
Received: from KANGAROO.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
id AA18238; Wed, 3 May 95 00:53:05 EDT
Received: by kangaroo.mit.edu; (5.65/1.1.8.2/03Mar95-1146AM)
id AA13649; Wed, 3 May 1995 00:53:03 -0400
Date: Wed, 3 May 1995 00:53:03 -0400
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@kangaroo.mit.edu>
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
Message-Id: <9505030453.AA13649@kangaroo.mit.edu>
To: epeisach@MIT.EDU
----- Transcript of session follows -----
While talking to PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU:
>>> RCPT To:<krb5_bugs>
<<< 550 <krb5_bugs>... User unknown
550 krb5_bugs... User unknown
----- Unsent message follows -----
Received: by kangaroo.mit.edu; (5.65/1.1.8.2/03Mar95-1146AM)
id AA13647; Wed, 3 May 1995 00:53:03 -0400
Date: Wed, 3 May 1995 00:53:03 -0400
From: <epeisach>
Message-Id: <9505030453.AA13647@kangaroo.mit.edu>
To: krb5_bugs
Subject: krb5_recvauth rc_type is unused
From the API, it should determine the type of replay cache to use...
It looks like from the code that the "server" is what determines ths
cache. rc_type is unused... Does one dare to want to change the API
again, or make use of it?
Ezra
------- End of Forwarded Message
