[11596] in Kerberos-V5-bugs
Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #6686] IPv6 support for kprop and kpropd
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (nalin@redhat.com via RT)
Thu Jul 1 14:06:29 2010
Mail-followup-to: rt@krbdev.mit.edu
mail-copies-to: never
From: "nalin@redhat.com via RT" <rt-comment@krbdev.MIT.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <rt-6686@krbdev.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <rt-6686-32981.2.25984426275296@krbdev.mit.edu>
To: "'AdminCc of krbdev.mit.edu Ticket #6686'":;"'AdminCc of krbdev.mit.edu Ticket #6686'":;@MIT.EDU
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 14:06:26 -0400 (EDT)
Reply-To: rt-comment@krbdev.MIT.EDU
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: krb5-bugs-bounces@mit.edu
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 12:42:12PM -0400, Greg Hudson via RT wrote:
> Opening two listener sockets in kpropd is more difficult than I expected,
> because of the complicated iprop logic. So I'm committing a variation of
> your patch.
>
> Why did you add AI_V4MAPPED to hints in the first getaddrinfo query?
It's more or less a leftover. It didn't actually have any effect on my
test machine, but it puts that call to getaddrinfo() more in line with
the behavior glibc follows when the hints structure is NULL (which is to
behave as if the supplied flags were (AI_V4MAPPED | AI_ADDRCONFIG)).
Nalin
_______________________________________________
krb5-bugs mailing list
krb5-bugs@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krb5-bugs
