[11193] in Kerberos-V5-bugs
Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #6570] PATCH: Fix symbol collision between krb5
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tom Yu via RT)
Fri Oct 2 13:48:14 2009
Mail-Followup-To: rt@krbdev.mit.edu
mail-copies-to: never
From: "Tom Yu via RT" <rt-comment@krbdev.MIT.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <rt-6570@krbdev.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <rt-6570-31799.14.4206479523744@krbdev.mit.edu>
To: "'AdminCc of krbdev.mit.edu Ticket #6570'":;"'AdminCc of krbdev.mit.edu Ticket #6570'":;@MIT.EDU
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 17:47:41 +0000 (UTC)
Reply-To: rt-comment@krbdev.MIT.EDU
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: krb5-bugs-bounces@mit.edu
"\"\" W.Michael Petullo \" via RT\"" <rt-comment@krbdev.mit.edu>
writes:
> I have attached a patch against krb5 1.7 that fixes a symbol collision
> between krb5 and uClibc. This allows one to compile krb5 against uClibc.
Thanks. Why is there a definition of ruserpass() in uClibc? It looks
useful only to the ftp client. Should we use a system-provided copy
of ruserpass() if available? We might perform the function renaming
as an interim solution if we are going to attempt to use the system
version of the function.
_______________________________________________
krb5-bugs mailing list
krb5-bugs@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krb5-bugs
