[1067] in Kerberos-V5-bugs
Current sources kadmin/v4server bug
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (epeisach@MIT.EDU)
Sat Feb 4 21:51:13 1995
From: epeisach@MIT.EDU
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 1995 21:51:03 -0500
To: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
Looking at prototype errors turned up these....
The int vs. krb5_boolean probably will not matter, but the second
argument to krb5_db_delete_principal is a principal, not an entry... I
guess no one tested the code....
Ezra
===================================================================
RCS file: /mit/krb5/.cvsroot/src/kadmin/v4server/kadm_funcs.c,v
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -c -r1.15 kadm_funcs.c
*** 1.15 1995/01/26 04:02:02
--- kadm_funcs.c 1995/02/04 23:21:05
***************
*** 294,300 ****
Kadm_vals *valsout;
{
int numfound; /* check how many we get written */
! int more; /* pointer to more grabbed records */
Principal data_i, data_o; /* temporary principal */
u_char flags[4];
krb5_db_entry entry, odata;
--- 294,300 ----
Kadm_vals *valsout;
{
int numfound; /* check how many we get written */
! krb5_boolean more; /* pointer to more grabbed records */
Principal data_i, data_o; /* temporary principal */
u_char flags[4];
krb5_db_entry entry, odata;
***************
*** 332,338 ****
faildel(KADM_NOENTRY);
}
! retval = krb5_db_delete_principal(kadm_context, &entry, &numfound);
if (retval) {
krb5_db_free_principal(kadm_context, &entry, numfound);
faildel(retval);
--- 332,338 ----
faildel(KADM_NOENTRY);
}
! retval = krb5_db_delete_principal(kadm_context, inprinc, &numfound);
if (retval) {
krb5_db_free_principal(kadm_context, &entry, numfound);
faildel(retval);
