[7121] in Kerberos
Re: Kerberos Principals
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bill Sommerfeld)
Thu Apr 18 17:53:27 1996
To: tomryan@camlaw.rutgers.edu (Tom Ryan)
Cc: kerberos@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: tomryan's message of 18 Apr 1996 10:57:54 -0000.
<4l5l9i$laa@camlaw.rutgers.edu>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 1996 17:35:40 -0400
From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@apollo.hp.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
<flame> If you're talking about those entities in kerberos which have
a name and a secret key, the word is "principal", not "principle"
The words may be pronounced the same, but they have very different
meanings.
</flame>
Rutgers has chosen to go with principal names that do not match our
usernames.
That's really silly. Why?
Any pointers/ideas?
It sounds like you're in need of a rutgers-specific hack to implement this.
- Bill
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBMXa1pVpj/0M1dMJ/AQHYxAP9H6/chEeQwdOVBdJmoehl7cD0D8LSC+qG
4M5kdaZIkXDPPb3C5h5DhhXVw4kbK8ZqO6uY7FByOl+qimuVSddCNe66DTJm30BT
dwIs0zgV++4ecP/kHMxAFhaIxWYI4Zb61a4/s6xJ8ywAXZ5RvPqNyf+McM0iiPzv
t3qHG+tfxHA=
=nDFY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
