[6442] in Kerberos
Re: Performance of CNS vs. AFS kaserver?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Derrick J. Brashear)
Fri Jan 5 16:15:48 1996
To: kerberos@MIT.EDU
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 1996 15:14:34 -0500
From: "Derrick J. Brashear" <shadow+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Excerpts from netnews.comp.protocols.kerberos: 5-Jan-96 Re: Performance
of CNS vs. .. by John Gardiner Myers@CMU.
> At CMU, we've modified those two programs to know about both
> string-to-keys and to prefer the MIT one. As a result, we have a
> kaserver with most of the keys encoded in the MIT string-to-key.
> Unfortunately, we can't distribute the modified clients because they
> are encumbered by Transarc ownership.
Of course, you could complain to Transarc to incorporate it. I know they
have the patches:-)
-D
