[6433] in Kerberos
Re: Performance of CNS vs. AFS kaserver?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Trey Harris)
Thu Jan 4 18:43:12 1996
To: kerberos@MIT.EDU
Date: 4 Jan 1996 23:23:09 GMT
From: harris@email.unc.edu (Trey Harris)
In article <Ikv1D1G00WBwA11nlN@andrew.cmu.edu>,
John Gardiner Myers <jgm+@CMU.EDU> wrote:
>The ".krb" versions are useful for getting MIT/CNS clients to use the
>Transarc server, not the other way around. To use a MIT/CNS server,
>you would have to use a MIT/CNS login and other clients. You'd have
>to modify the clients (or use aklog) to install an AFS token in the
>kernel.
Are you sure about this? The .krb commands supplied (klog, pagsh, tokens,
and login/authenticate plugins) are all authentication clients. If you're
talking about modifying the server to work with standard Kerberos clients,
wouldn't it be a /usr/afs/bin/kaserver.krb instead?
--
Trey Harris http://sunsite.unc.edu/harris/
System Administrator, Project Isis, Office of Information Technology
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
