[6018] in Kerberos
Re: kerberos v4 or v5 on osf 3.2
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dieter Muller)
Wed Oct 18 09:54:07 1995
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans@MIT.EDU>
Cc: kerberos@MIT.EDU
Return-Receipt-To:
In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 17 Oct 1995 11:00:29 EDT
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 07:40:17 -0600
From: Dieter Muller <dworkin@suod.cs.colorado.edu>
Sam Hartman <hartmasn@mit.edu> wrote:
: >>>>> "Dieter" == Dieter Muller <dworkin@suod.cs.colorado.edu> writes:
: Were you using the latest CNS (95q1)? I know there were bugs,
: but I thought Cygnus already released fixes? The reason I ask about
: this is that version already includes a port of the BSD rdist. The
: reason I thought you were doing something new as that the BSD rdist
: code already had been ported to CNS.
Yes, my changes are based on the 95q1 release. There may be patches
from Cygnus, but they certainly weren't mentioned when I got the
source a couple of months ago, nor were they obvious when I hit their
ftp site.
As to the rdist question, I mistyped, in an mistaken effort to
simplify the post. There is a BSD rdist in the CNS release. What I
am actually doing is replacing the rsh and rshd with the ones that
have session-encryption hooks, and modifying the rdist to use those (a
trivial hack). Thus, we get encrypted file updates via rdist. I
believe this version of rsh and rshd are from BSD44 via UCS.
Dworkin
