| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: Jeffrey I. Schiller <jis@ATHENA.MIT.EDU> To: jtkohl@ATHENA.MIT.EDU Cc: kerberos@ATHENA.MIT.EDU In-Reply-To: John T Kohl's message of Wed, 4 Jan 89 11:03:02 EST <8901041603.AA26691@LYCUS.MIT.EDU> From my point of view I have yet to see a reason to change the key's version number when the master key is changed. In fact there with things as currently implemented, there isn't really a need to implement the incrementing of the master key version number. Now if kerberos was modified so that KDCs were implemented as a set of distributed database servers (say as opposed to the simple master/slave relationship now implemented) or if support was simply added to handle keys encrypted in multiple master keys (ie. you have to have "N" master keys active to operate) then the version number becomes important, otherwise I don't see the need... -Jeff
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |