[5484] in Kerberos
Re: sserver: recvauth failed--Bad file number
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Stewart)
Tue Jul 11 19:30:06 1995
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans@MIT.EDU>
Cc: kerberos@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 11 Jul 1995 11:17:31 EDT."
<199507111517.LAA12483@infocalypse.MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 1995 16:20:17 -0700
From: John Stewart <jns@cisco.com>
-> It sounds like a bug I fixed recently in recvauth.c. Basically,
-> sendauth under v5 waits for a response from the server, either a null
-> message indicating success, or a krb_err reply indicating an error.
-> Unfortunately, recvauth only sends the error reply if problem (the
-> error code) is both zero and non-zero. I suspect that after fixing
-> this, you'll find a different problem (either in local configuration,
-> or in the kcmd protocol) that causes the error.
->
-> I have included a patch below to recvauth.c. Several other changes to
-> recvauth.c have been made since beta5, but this patch appears to apply
-> cleanly to the beta5 recvauth; I didn't try rebuilding.
->
-> --Sam
Thanx for the patch Sam -- it successfully rebuilt and attacked the
problem I saw. I'm curious, and this is something I still haven't seen
in the new code.
Is there an equivalent for the V4 "ksrvtgt" -- in the hopes of using
encrypted rdist via V5 and krsh I need an "automated way to grant a
ticket" -- and that doesn't appear to be documented for V5. Is there
such a beast, and is it new?
Thx again for the help -- John
John Stewart Systems Administrator/Web Developer Email: jns@cisco.com
Adv. Customer Systems Where no one Phone: +1.408.526.8499
Cisco Systems, Inc. has gone before... FAX: +1.408.526.8787
