[4054] in Kerberos
Re: Few basic questions II (non-buggy repost)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dennis Glatting)
Tue Oct 18 22:35:53 1994
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 94 19:23:41 -0700
From: Dennis Glatting <war04!dennisg@kerby.ocsg.com>
To: tfs@gravity.science.gmu.edu ( Tim)
Cc: kerberos@MIT.EDU
Reply-To: dpg@ocsg.com
> I'm wondering 2 things, both related to beginning to get
> this stuff put in. First, is there a distribution of the
> code that's been maintained in a more up to date fashion
> than the MIT archive? First quarter of 94 was a while ago,
> and is pre-IRIX 5.2 it seems. So I'm wondering if there's
> either A. a more current archive, or B. wether some brave
> soul out there has all ready done the work on IRIX I'm
> attempting to do.
>
1Q94? You're looking at the wrong stuff.
> The other thing I'm wondering is in relation to NeXTSTEP,
> & is if anyone has built it for versions above 3.0 with a
> degree of success. I ask this because after looking at the
> Code Tree I can immediately identify the telnet source,
> and ~know~ it will not work as is. I've ported it all ready
> for a different application, so I know it's crufty old
> code. I'm concerned the rest of the distribution will
> fall into that category as well. Hell, even a
> better/newer port of the telnet source would be welcome
> as hell.
>
Our product supports NeXTSTEP 3.2. I use it every day (literally). I
have built MIT Kerberos 5 beta 2 on NeXTSTEP 3.2 too. You have a
little hack'n to do.
-dpg
