[4030] in Kerberos
Re: I need comment on Kerberos vs. NetSP (IBM)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Thor Lancelot Simon)
Wed Oct 12 19:11:20 1994
To: kerberos@MIT.EDU
Date: 12 Oct 1994 18:38:16 -0400
From: tls@panix.com (Thor Lancelot Simon)
In article <199410122117.RAA26586@gza-client1.cam.ov.com>,
Arthur Houle 904-487-8677 <HOULEA@mail.firn.edu> wrote:
[deletia]
>Static addressing would require a dedicated port for each user. We can't
>afford to spend that much on our user community. Dial-up is a shared
>facility for us.
Yes, well, it's a shared facility here as well. So? Why does that imply
a dedicated port for each user?
--
Thor Lancelot Simon tls@panix.COM
- What is hardest to accept about the passage of time is that the people who -
- once mattered the most to us are wrapped up in parentheses. --John Irving -
