| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Message-ID: <1b7e7376-528a-4ba7-a942-e43016ada39d@mit.edu> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 15:25:04 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jake Scott <jake@poptart.org>, kerberos@mit.edu Content-Language: en-US From: "Greg Hudson" <ghudson@mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <CAExmWcgam_XtE+32_weR_hrO1ZDb-irNpWCaP0QxA3_c9zfcyw@mail.gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu On 1/29/25 12:00, Jake Scott wrote: > We are currently migrating data from an LDAP backend (MIT v1.18) to a new > suffix. We've dumped the data using kdb5_util and are attempting to restore > it using a new configuration with the updated suffix. > > During the restore process, it appears that the principals are being added > back using their original DNs instead of under the new suffix. Is this > expected behavior? We were surprised to find the principal DNs included in > the dump file. That is expected behavior. I would speculate that the design intent was that administrators can set explicit DNs when creating principals, and that dumping and loading should preserve that DN structure rather than creating a new one based on the container DN and principal names. I don't see an easier workaround for your use case than modifying the dump file. Unfortunately, the principal DNs are hidden two layers deep: * Within each principal line are fields representing zero or more type-length-data records. The placement and structure of these records is documented in https://github.com/krb5/krb5/pull/1408 . * Within the tl-data record of type 255 is an encoded series of LDAP type-length-data subrecords. This encoding isn't documented anywhere as far as I know (I will hopefully add it to the PR), but it's one or more repetitions of a one-byte tag, a two-byte big-endian length, and then <length> bytes of data. Tag 3 indicates a user DN. You could change the tag of the subrecord to some nonsense value (like 255) to cause it to be ignored, or remove it and fix up the length of the containing field. ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |