[36554] in Kerberos
Re: No mention of _kerberos TXT in RFCs / but we have DNSSEC now
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rick van Rein)
Fri Oct 17 02:25:35 2014
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Rick van Rein <rick@openfortress.nl>
In-Reply-To: <201410170315.s9H3FcSZ017193@hedwig.cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 08:24:29 +0200
Message-Id: <3224560A-7677-40FF-B3F4-28044FB8C768@openfortress.nl>
To: Ken Hornstein <kenh@cmf.nrl.navy.mil>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Cc: kerberos@mit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Errors-To: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Thanks Ken & Benjamin,
Your combined response indicates that there is no clear reason that TXT
records ought to stay out, and indeed, that the recent introduction of
DNSSEC into the landscape means it could have some re-evaluation.
That’s pretty much what I wanted to know. No need to dig up detail-ridden
discussions from the past! Had it been public, then I think I would have
found it already anyway.
Cheers,
-Rick
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
