[36022] in Kerberos
Crypto backends for MIT Kerberos V5
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Arpit Srivastava)
Thu Apr 10 12:42:30 2014
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 22:12:09 +0530
Message-ID: <CAEvOXU4-bw=gCDLziqY0_cFZbbwi8xRP-hO=sYAre23KfgmPsw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Arpit Srivastava <arpit.orb@gmail.com>
To: kerberos <kerberos@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu
Hi,
MIT Kerberos lists three crypto backends including OpenSSL and built-in.
1. Can somebody enumerate what are the differences between OpenSSL and
builin crypto backends ? What benefits do I have if I use OpenSSL and not
the builtin version.
2. Is builtin crypto backend completely interoperable with Windows
infrastructure (AD etc) ?
5. What version of OpenSSL is compliant with krb-1.10 onwards - because I
found some updates relates to Camellia cipher etc.
Best,
Arpit
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
